peoples-defense:

acemindbreaker:

titaniumelemental:

fierceawakening:

peoples-defense:

sometimes i read or skim arguments/talking points with the sense that like…..you’re thinking way too hard about this. like not in a dismissive way, not “you just wasted your time lol what a loser go outside”, it’s more like “why are people being made to think SO DEEPLY about shit that doesn’t matter”.

something that seriously pisses me off is people who say stuff along the lines of “if you do/like/think X then think really hard about why you do” like 1) don’t tell me what to do 2) maybe i have thought really hard about it and this is how i feel afterwards 3) ITS NOT THAT DEEP

this is in all sorts of discourse and honestly it reeks of the guys i met in high school who tried to convince me i wasn’t really attracted to women cause they always told me to think about why i like women instead of men (i ID’d as a genderqueer lesbian back then) and if i said i had they’d tell me to think harder. they didn’t care about me. they just wanted me to not be gay. they just wanted me to be available to them.

people who tell you to think hard about some random aspect about you are not being ingenious. they are not encouraging self discovery. they just want you to admit that they are right and you are wrong because eventually you’ll run out of arguments and statements you’ve rehashed a thousand times and just get mad and then they’ll use your anger against you.

y’all. IT AINT THAT DEEP. queer discourse? it’s faster and easier than saying “nonbinary genderfluid and bi” and encompasses my identities and beyond. for me, that’s it. i’ve typed out paragraphs on why i use the word but it all boils down to that.

shipping discourse? sometimes we just fucking like things and it doesn’t mean shit in our brains because brains are funky things we still don’t understand. i’m not going to dive deep into the inner mechanisms of my psyche because i like a ship with dubcon elements. it’s not that fucking serious. you’re not going to catch me engaging with a lot of “reasons why shipping x is okay” because i’ve grown up with weird ships and characters ever since i was 10 and hey, look at me, i’m queer and mentally ill but i’ve never fucking killed anyone like i apparently would have done if fiction really was at a 1:1 ratio with reality. the irony is that so many shipping arguments are bunk if you use your goddamn brain for ten seconds and engage in some nuance and critical thinking for once.

ace discourse?? “think really hard about why you ID as ace”?? because they don’t experience sexual attraction you utter walnut. and whether that’s due to trauma or internalized xphobia or what, it’s nobody’s fucking business aside from that person.

all these people are doing are trying to worm their gross ideologies into your head and make you doubt who you are. when i was younger i fell into these traps and came out like “okay i thought about it and i still like this so what now,” and they don’t have answers beyond that. because it’s a subtle guilt trip to get you to admit that you’re a liar, that you’re actually cis/straight/not mentally ill/<insert other identity aspect here> because how dare you exist as one of those people.

ugh. that’s my semi-legible rant of the day, the point being that nobody is allowed to dictate or determine my identity aside from me and sometimes therapists, and people who try to guilt people into hating themselves over dumb arbitrary shit can fuck off forever.

It’s radical feminist influence from what I can tell. Started with telling kinky people to examine their desires and ballooned from there.

people who tell you to think hard about some random aspect about you are not being ingenious. they are not encouraging self discovery. they just want you to admit that they are right

And the thing is, examining that sort of stuff can be a good thing, if you’re up for it. I’ve put a lot of thought into what my kinks are and why I might have these particular kinks and how my kinks work. And I love when other people do the same sort of analysis. (Honestly, I’d be fascinated to hear a lesbian try to go into an in-depth analysis of why they’re attracted to women and not men.)

But they don’t want the kind of analysis I’ve done, because it hasn’t led me to decide to stop being kinky. Firstly, because you can’t just analyze your way into a new sexuality. And secondly, because my analysis has led me to be more accepting of my kinks rather than less, and more likely to act on them because I have a clearer idea of which SSC activities might twig my kinks and how to do them.

And I certainly don’t think it should be obligatory to analyze your preferences. Your beliefs, yes. Unexamined beliefs are very prone to being wrong. But preferences aren’t right or wrong, they just are.

i agree! i’m a very introspective person, idk about y’all, but i spend a LOT of time thinking about myself. examining yourself is good for you, as long as you’re doing it because YOU want to, because you WANT to.

if you want to analyze your kinks/gender/sexuality/etc, that’s great! go for it! i do it all the time, especially as someone with fluid identities. and yes, absolutely examine your beliefs and work on the bigotry and stereotypes in your brain. we all have them. it’s very important to stamp out bigoted opinions.

there’s a huge difference between “question yourself to learn more about yourself” and “question yourself to the point of insecurity and self hatred/doubt because i don’t like something about you and your labels.” i’m glad that a lot of people can recognize the difference between these.

a-polite-melody:

Biphobia/multispec-antagonism
is a subset of homophobia you say? It’s just a category that can be lumped
under homophobia, huh?

Because calling
a queer person who is attracted to multiple genders a “dickriding bislut”
can definitely
be
classed under homophobia
(/s – bold and italics will be used to refer
to sarcasm for the rest of this post). [x]*

And saying
that bi people are only comfortable with the word queer because it is never
used against them
is exactly the same as homophobia. [x]

Just like
calling bi people nuthuggers and saying that they’re dangerous, disgusting,
dirty, misogynistic manlovers who condone rape
is totally just a form of
homophobia.
 [x]

And saying
that bi women having attraction to men makes them untrustworthy
is entirely
like homophobia.
 [x]

Or like how
essentially victim blaming bi women because they didn’t drop their attraction
to men and dated more men after enduring so much from men before and claiming
they have het privilege
is so similar to homophobia. [x]

And using one
example of a lesbophobic bi woman as a reason for it to be okay to call bi
women “vile man lovers”
is just like homophobia. [x]

In the same
vein as using some examples of not so nice bi people as reason to hate all
bisexuals
is just like homophobia. [x]

Having people
claim that bi women aren’t as oppressed and aren’t queer when they’re in a relationship
with a man
is close enough to homophobia to call
biphobia/mspec-antagonism a subset of it.
 [x]

And having
people say that bi people are contributing to their own erasure for “enjoying
the comfort and safety of a heterosexual relationship” and that they “aren’t as
queer as actual homosexuals”
is similar to homophobia. [x]

Or saying that
because it’s more common for bi people to end up in relationships that are not
with someone of the same gender, that we have privilege
is pretty well the same as
homophobia.
 [x]

And purposeful
and even explicit want of the exclusion of pansexual (and asexual) people from LGBT+ spaces

is relatable
to homophobia.
(Bonus points for aphobia.) [x]

Oh, and a
person within the LGBT+ community erasing a canon bisexual character’s
orientation
while simultaneously denying that bi women can be correctively
raped and saying that bisexual women are considered the ideal women
 sounds so much like homophobia. [x] [x]

And someone
claiming that calling someone “bihet” or calling a couple “bihet” isn’t erasure
and isn’t demonizing bi people not in same gender relationships
is
just part of homophobia
. (Bonus points for it being in reference to a
polyamory-antagonistic post.
Yes, I do know that it can sometimes be a problem
in terms of cat-fishing to add someone for a threesome, however simply a polyam
couple looking for a third isn’t in any way intrusive. And this post doesn’t
clarify one way or the other about which this was.) [x] [x]

Claiming that
bi women call themselves wlw to claim lesbian oppression and distance
themselves from “straight privilege” while denying that biphobia isn’t equally
harmful
, claiming that bi people are trying to help trans people “trample over
the LG”
(bonus points for transphobia), and even denying the multispec
orientation of the well-known champions of Stonewall
is entirely like homophobia. [x] [x] [x]

And centering
bi women’s lives revolve around being “proud cocksuckers”, “loving dick”, “craving
sperm”, “whoring it up with jizz”
, calling bi women nuthuggers and dick suckers
while saying we should calm down about it because it’s “just words”
, telling bi
women to shut up if they’re in a relationship with a man and that we need to
give up on men to be accepted
(into TERF spaces, so yeah, don’t want that
anyway), saying that bisexuals are less oppressed than homosexuals, and
claiming that bisexual women are politically classed as heterosexual to the
point of saying that the purpose of bisexuality in modern society is to keep
women heterosexual
can totally be classified as a subset of homophobia. [x] [x] [x] [x]

Yeah. You can
totally class biphobia/multispec-antagonism as a subset of homophobia.
Entirely.
Because it’s so similar, and totally only demonizes people for
same-gender attraction
, and doesn’t at all specifically target their
attraction to multiple genders
, and totally doesn’t make multi-spec
people feel that they need to be closeted even in LGBT+ spaces.
 [x]

Fuck off with
that shit.


*Links in [x] are archived versions. I wanted to leave the links to the actual tumblr posts so it’s easier to block these people if you choose to.

The evidence speaks for itself about why this is terrible. Please unfollow (and better yet, just fucking block me) if you think this way

creepy-witchy-af:

planeswalker-umbral:

nichtschwert:

irishfino:

ithelpstodream:

“it’s just a parking lot”

exactly. there’s nothing there. not a statue. not a plaque. nothing.

[drives over hitler’s death site]

Bloody amazing.

And you know what’s right next to it?

That’s right, the Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden, which translates to the Memorial for the murdered jews.

So if you wanna go have a look at the monument commemorating the victims of Hitler’s regime, you can park your car right on the spot he died and walk there.

Makes ya think, doesn’t it?

Germany gets why you shouldn’t have monuments to your bad points in history.

But try explaining to Americans they have bad points in their history.

Well part of it is that we also didn’t have, you know, HITLER

Not to like, compare tragedies or something, because horrible things in human history don’t need a measuring contest, but you know, slavery is uhhhhhh bad